---

SprinkleOtter wrote:

---

ScribeGT6817 wrote:

---

Shougun70 wrote:
Does that mean that the Red Star USED to work? To be specific, did the Red Star actually revive people and transport them back at one point in the Matoran Universe's lifetime?

---

Yes

---

So, when would it have stopped working? And why?

---

I don't have an exact date when, but we have already seen that a lot of things related to the MU had glitches. Remember, this was a very sophisticated device that was built in a rush.

---

SprinkleOtter wrote:

Erm, Greg, your BZPower sig reads "Bionicle Returning 2015". I highly doubt this is your doing- I thought you should know.

---

Hi SO,

I no longer have an account with BZP. It got hacked a couple years ago and the BZP Admins cancelled it and told me if I wanted to re-up, I should just contact them. So anything you are seeing on BZP is someone posing as me and you should notify the admins there.

---

ZuyGrubas wrote:

Well, I've got few questions:

 

1) Did you really want to put dinosaurs at the end of 5th BIONICLE movie, or maybe this is just a joke?

2) What influence can Makuta's viruses  have on a living person?

3) If BIONICLE get back, would you start writing all new stories?

4) If someone wearing the Mask of Undeath dies and then he cames back from death, he can complete his last objective. And then what? He dies again? And what if this objective is already completed by someone else (for example defeating some EVIL guy)? Can the "undead" still live and do other things? What if someone will harm or injure, or even kill the "undead"? Can he regenerate himself or use mask again to resurrect? Also, can undead talk or eat (take energy) or feel emotions?

 

Okay, maybe more than few auestions.

---

1) No, I really did think bio-mechanical dinosaurs would be cool and would fit with where we were idly chatting about taking the story.

2) You mean like a Glatorian? Probably none, they are the equivalent of computer viruses.

3) No idea. That would be up to LEGO and the book publishers. I can only do it if they ask me to.

4) Do you remember the mask name for that? I need to look it up to refresh my memory of what it can and cannot do.

---

agentaaa wrote:

Hi Greg! I just have a couple questions regarding the bionicle story.

1: Is there a general statement you could give regarding the difference between a toa and a toa nuva's level of power over their chosen element?

2: Is there any part of the bionicle story you specifically don't like or like less looking back that you included?

 

3: Other than just the fact the sets had changed a lot in design and the like, was there any reason in particular that the Toa Mata looked so different from pretty much any toa team that came after?

---

1) Not really, no. The major difference between the two is that Nuva can share their mask powers, Mata cannot. On an elemental level, they did have more power and they did have better control of it, but the mask thing was a much bigger change.

2) Yes. I never liked Vakama turning bad in the third movie. I protested against that then and I still feel it was a mistake.

3) Prototypes usually look different from what follows. The Mata were among the first Toa created. 

---

SprinkleOtter wrote:

---

ScribeGT6817 wrote:

---

agentaaa wrote:

Hi Greg! I just have a couple questions regarding the bionicle story.

1: Is there a general statement you could give regarding the difference between a toa and a toa nuva's level of power over their chosen element?

2: Is there any part of the bionicle story you specifically don't like or like less looking back that you included?

 

3: Other than just the fact the sets had changed a lot in design and the like, was there any reason in particular that the Toa Mata looked so different from pretty much any toa team that came after?

---

1) Not really, no. The major difference between the two is that Nuva can share their mask powers, Mata cannot. On an elemental level, they did have more power and they did have better control of it, but the mask thing was a much bigger change.

2) Yes. I never liked Vakama turning bad in the third movie. I protested against that then and I still feel it was a mistake.

 

3) Prototypes usually look different from what follows. The Mata were among the first Toa created. 

---

2. Was tree-speak mandatory?

---

Not sure what you mean. Do you mean in the Matoran  universe or in the writing of the story?

---

SprinkleOtter wrote:

---

ScribeGT6817 wrote:

---

SprinkleOtter wrote:

---

ScribeGT6817 wrote:

---

Shougun70 wrote:
Does that mean that the Red Star USED to work? To be specific, did the Red Star actually revive people and transport them back at one point in the Matoran Universe's lifetime?

---

Yes

---

So, when would it have stopped working? And why?

---

I don't have an exact date when, but we have already seen that a lot of things related to the MU had glitches. Remember, this was a very sophisticated device that was built in a rush.

---

So, did anyone in Mata Nui know the purpose of the Red Star? Axon seemed to, to a degree.

Yeah, the Great Bings did a pretty good job in that respect.

---

Yes, I am sure there were beings on the upper levels of the power hierarchy who knew.

---

Jona0727 wrote:

WHAT WILL BE THE 2015 SEASON OF NINJAGO BE ABOUT! 

 

WILL JAY WIN NYA!

 

WILL A NEW ENEY FROM THE PAST ATTACK!

 

SO MUCH STUFF UNKNOWN!

---

And it's unknown for a reason Because LEGO employees are not allowed to give out these kind of spoilers.

---

Fippe_ wrote:

[quote]Prototypes usually look different from what follows. The Mata were among the first Toa created. [/quote]

 

Does that mean that Helryx's body is similar to a body of a Toa Mata?

---

Or she could have looked somewhat different, since as the first Toa, she was an even earlier prototype than the Mata were.